Finjan, Inc. v. Bitdefender Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04790-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
v. ANSWER AND DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO SEAL
BITDEFENDER INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 126, 127, 133 Defendants.
On August 16, 2017, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) filed its complaint against Defendants Bitdefender Inc., and Bitdefender S.R.L. (collectively, “Bitdefender”). Dkt. No. 1. Bitdefender filed its answer and counterclaims on November 22, 2017. Dkt. No. 25. Bitdefender filed a first amended answer on May 8, 2018. Dkt. Nos. 78, 79. Finjan filed its answer to Bitdefender’s counterclaims on May 22, 2018. Dkt. Nos. 82, 83. On June 8, 2019, Bitdefender filed this motion for leave to file an amended answer, to include a counterclaim for breach of contract. Dkt. No. 127 (“Mot.”). Finjan filed its opposition to this motion on July 2, 2019, Dkt. No. 132 (“Opp.”), and Bitdefender filed its reply…