Finjan, Inc. v. Bitdefender Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04790-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

9 v. ANSWER AND DENYING

DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO SEAL

10 BITDEFENDER INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 126, 127, 133 11 Defendants.

12 On August 16, 2017, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) filed its complaint against Defendants 13 Bitdefender Inc., and Bitdefender S.R.L. (collectively, “Bitdefender”). Dkt. No. 1. Bitdefender 14 filed its answer and counterclaims on November 22, 2017. Dkt. No. 25. Bitdefender filed a first 15 amended answer on May 8, 2018. Dkt. Nos. 78, 79. Finjan filed its answer to Bitdefender’s 16 counterclaims on May 22, 2018. Dkt. Nos. 82, 83. On June 8, 2019, Bitdefender filed this motion 17 for leave to file an amended answer, to include a counterclaim for breach of contract. Dkt. No. 18 127 (“Mot.”). Finjan filed its opposition to this motion on July 2, 2019, Dkt. No. 132 (“Opp.”), 19 and Bitdefender filed its reply…