In re E-3 Systems Litigation

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20194:19-cv-01453California2,809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSE FRANCO, Case No. 19-cv-01453-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND

v. Re: Dkt. No. 8 E-3 SYSTEMS, Defendant.

JOSE FRANCO, Case No. 19-cv-02854-HSG Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No.

v.

E-3 SYSTEMS, Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Jose Franco filed these putative class and representative actions in state court. Case No. 19-cv-1453-HSG, Dkt. No. 1, Ex. A (“Mot.”); Case No. 19-cv-2854-HSG, Dkt. No. 1, Ex. A. Defendant removed the actions to federal court based on federal preemption under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1974 (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185. Dkt. No. 1; Case No. 19-cv-2854-HSG, Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff now seeks to remand the actions back to state court. After carefully considering the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.