Rivers

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 KEITH RIVERS, Case No. 19-cv-06609-JSC

6 Plaintiff,

SECTION 1915 SCREENING OF

7 v. COMPLAINT

8 UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendant. 9

10 Keith Rivers brings this action against the University of San Francisco (the “University”), 11 for alleged employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 12 (Dkt. No. 1.) Having granted Mr. Rivers’ application to proceed in forma pauperis, (see Dkt. No. 13 5), the Court now screens the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and concludes that the 14 complaint is deficient for the reasons stated below. 15 COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS 16 Mr. Rivers’ “Employment Discrimination Complaint” alleges that he was subject to 17 adverse employment actions because of his race and sex. (Dkt. No. 1 at 1-2 ¶¶ 4-5.) The form 18 complaint itself includes no factual allegations and instead references an attachment that includes 19 “General Facts.” (See id. at 2 ¶ 6; see also…