Rivers

Rivers v. University of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20193:19-cv-06609California1,221 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 KEITH RIVERS, Case No. 19-cv-06609-JSC

Plaintiff,

SECTION 1915 SCREENING OF

v. COMPLAINT

UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendant.

Keith Rivers brings this action against the University of San Francisco (the “University”), for alleged employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Dkt. No. 1.) Having granted Mr. Rivers’ application to proceed in forma pauperis, (see Dkt. No. 5), the Court now screens the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and concludes that the complaint is deficient for the reasons stated below. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Mr. Rivers’ “Employment Discrimination Complaint” alleges that he was subject to adverse employment actions because of his race and sex. (Dkt. No. 1 at 1-2 ¶¶ 4-5.) The form complaint itself includes no factual allegations and instead references an attachment that includes “General Facts.” (See id. at 2 ¶ 6; see also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.