Vanlengen

Vanlengen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20193:18-cv-00566California1,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENA LANE VANLENGEN,

Case No. 18-cv-00566-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES UNDER THE

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

SECURITY, AND SECTION 406(B)(1) OF THE

SOCIAL SECURITY ACT

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 29, 31 12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Rena VanLengen brought this action seeking review of the final decision of Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”) denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. In its July 3, 2019 Order, the Court reversed the decision of the Commissioner and remanded for award of benefits. Plaintiff now brings two fee motions, seeking an award of attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“the EAJA Motion”) and under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.