Vanlengen

Vanlengen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20193:18-cv-00566California1,064 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

RENA LANE VANLENGEN,

7 Case No. 18-cv-00566-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR 9 ATTORNEYS’ FEES UNDER THE

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

10 SECURITY, AND SECTION 406(B)(1) OF THE

SOCIAL SECURITY ACT

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 29, 31 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Rena VanLengen brought this action seeking review of the final decision of 15 Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the 16 “Commissioner”) denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits 17 under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. In its July 3, 2019 Order, the Court reversed the 18 decision of the Commissioner and remanded for award of benefits. Plaintiff now brings two fee 19 motions, seeking an award of attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“the EAJA 20 Motion”) and under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.