Bridges

Bridges v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20191:18-cv-05764California400 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 KELVIN BRIDGES, Case No. 18-cv-05764-RMI

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

10 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

11 ANDREW M. SAUL, 12 Defendant.

13 14 This Social Security appeal was filed on September 20, 2018. (Dkt. 1). Pursuant to the 15 Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was due on March 7, 2019. 16 (Dkt. 2). Plaintiff’s motion has not yet been filed. 17 On October 7, 2019, the court entered an Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal. (Dkt. 18 19). The court therefore ordered Plaintiff to show cause, no later than November 7, 2019, why this 19 appeal should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. The deadline for 20 Plaintiff to respond to the court’s Order to Show Cause passed without a response from Plaintiff. 21 “In determining whether to dismiss an action for lack of prosecution, the district court is 22 required to weigh several factors: ‘(1) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.