Huang

Huang v. Nephos Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20193:18-cv-06654California3,248 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 10 XIAOHUA HUANG, No. C 18-06654 WHA 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER ON MOTION

TO STRIKE

13 NEPHOS INC., 14 Defendant. / 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this patent infringement action, accused infringer moves to strike pro se patent 18 owner’s infringement contentions, to dismiss the instant action with prejudice, and for 19 attorney’s fees. To the extent stated below, accused infringer’s motion is GRANTED. 20 STATEMENT 21 A prior order has set forth the background of this case (Dkt. No. 55). In brief, pro se 22 plaintiff Xiaohua Huang owns United States Patent Nos. 6,744,653 (“the ’653 patent”) and 23 6,999,331 (“the ’331 patent”), which patents generally involve ternary content addressable 24 memory (“TCAM”) technology used in the semiconductor chip industry. According to 25 plaintiff, the patents employ a TCAM design “using differential match line to achieve high 26 speed and lower power consumption” (Dkt. No. 65-9 at 11). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.