Albert D. Seeno Construction Company v. Aspen Insurance UK Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20193:17-cv-03765California578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALBERT D. SEENO CONSTRUCTION Case No. 17-cv-03765-SI COMPANY, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 98

ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITED,

11 Defendant. 12 The parties dispute whether plaintiffs may take the deposition of Greg Schopf. Mr. Schopf is an attorney who sent several letters on behalf of Aspen regarding two construction defect claims that were tendered under plaintiffs’ policies. Plaintiffs assert that Mr. Schopf was acting as a claims examiner when he sent the letters to plaintiffs’ insurance broker because Mr. Schopf investigated coverage issues and announced Aspen’s position. Plaintiffs contend that the positions Mr. Schopf took in the letters were unreasonable, and they wish to question Mr. Schopf about the basis for various statements that he made in the letters. Aspen describes Mr. Schopf as its coverage counsel, and contends that his communications with Aspen are protected under the attorney-client privilege. Aspen does not contend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.