Strojnik

Strojnik v. VY Verasa Commercial Company LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20193:19-cv-02556California1,561 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER STROJNIK, Case No. 3:19-cv-02556-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT AND

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

VY VERASA COMMERCIAL COMPANY ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH LLC, et al., SCHEDULING ORDER 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 24 12 Despite the Northern District of California’s orders related to Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) litigation, before me are two motions filed by ADA plaintiff Peter Strojnik. He brings suit against defendant VY Verasa Commercial Company LLC dba the Westin Verasa Napa for violations of the ADA, among other claims. Strojnik’s first motion seeks partial summary judgment, and the second seeks an order requiring VY Verasa to comply with the Scheduling Order for this case. The former motion runs afoul of the Northern District’s General Order 56 on ADA litigation; the latter lacks merit because Strojnik is equally at fault for the stalemate at which this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.