Strojnik

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PETER STROJNIK, Case No. 3:19-cv-02556-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

9 v. FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT AND

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

10 VY VERASA COMMERCIAL COMPANY ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH LLC, et al., SCHEDULING ORDER 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 24 12 13 Despite the Northern District of California’s orders related to Americans with Disabilities 14 Act (“ADA”) litigation, before me are two motions filed by ADA plaintiff Peter Strojnik. He 15 brings suit against defendant VY Verasa Commercial Company LLC dba the Westin Verasa Napa 16 for violations of the ADA, among other claims. Strojnik’s first motion seeks partial summary 17 judgment, and the second seeks an order requiring VY Verasa to comply with the Scheduling 18 Order for this case. The former motion runs afoul of the Northern District’s General Order 56 on 19 ADA litigation; the latter lacks merit because Strojnik is equally at fault for the stalemate at which 20 this…