Strojnik

Strojnik v. GF Carneros Tenant, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20193:19-cv-03583California1,337 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

BACKGROUND

22 A. Complaint Allegations 23 Mr. Strojnik is a disabled person as defined by the ADA. (Complaint at ¶¶ 2, 11.)2 In 24 particular, Mr. Strojnik is “legally disabled by virtue of a severe right-sided neural foraminal 25 stenosis with symptoms of femoral neuropathy, prostate cancer and renal cancer” and 26

1 All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 27 636(c). (Dkt. Nos. 7 and 15.) 1 “degenerative right knee.” (Id. at ¶ 3.) Mr. Strojnik planned to visit “California Wine Country” 2 and on or around April 18, 2019 reviewed hotel booking websites. (Id. at ¶ 15 and pp. 13, 16, 17, 3 18.) When perusing third-party booking websites, such websites “failed to identify and describe mobility related accessibility features and guest rooms offered through its reservations service in 4 enough detail to reasonably permit Plaintiff to assess independently whether Defendant’s Hotel 5 meets his accessibility needs.” (Id. at ¶ 17.) In addition, the third-party sites “failed to make 6 reservations for accessible guest rooms available in the same manner as individuals who do not 7 need accessible rooms.” (Id. at ¶ 18.) Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

Strojnik · N.D. California · 2019 | Caselegis