Reynolds

Reynolds v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20193:17-cv-04202California4,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD LANCE REYNOLDS, Case No. 17-cv-04202-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

J. MERENDA, Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.

12 In this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Richard Lance Reynolds claims that correctional officer Merenda violated Reynolds’ Eighth Amendment rights. Merenda now moves for partial summary judgment on the merits of Reynolds’ claim and on the defense of qualified immunity. Reynolds does not oppose the motion. For the reasons discussed below, Merenda’s motion for partial summary judgment will be granted. The case will be referred to the Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program. 19 BACKGROUND Reynolds alleges that Merenda used excessive force on two occasions: (1) during efforts to handcuff Reynolds in the medical area and (2) in Merenda’s office, moments after the handcuffing. Only Merenda’s actions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.