Abel

Abel v. Oceanic Arcata, LP dba Red Roof Inn

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20193:17-cv-03734California2,154 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SHERIE ABEL, Case No. 17-cv-03734-SI

10 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

11 v. OCEANIC ARCATA'S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

12 OCEANIC ARCATA, LP, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 63 13 Defendants.

14 15 Defendant Oceanic Arcata’s motion for summary judgment was heard on November 8, 2019. 16 Having considered the papers submitted and the arguments made, the court hereby DENIES the 17 motion for summary judgment in its entirety. 18 19 BACKGROUND1 20 Plaintiff Sherie Abel is a quadriplegic who requires the assistance of a caretaker. Dkt. No. 21 49 at 22. In early September 2015, Ms. Abel and her husband, Steven Keck, visited the Red Roof 22 Inn in Arcata, California on their honeymoon. Dkt. No. 63-1 at 12 (Motion for Summary Judgment); 23 Dkt. No. 63-2 at 16-17 (Ex. A – Abel Depo.). They stayed in a handicapped accessible room. Dkt. 24 No. 63-1 at 14 (Motion for Summary Judgment). Ms. Huskelhus, an experienced caretaker,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.