Arnold
Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARIE A ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING METLIFE
10 v. GROUP, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AMENDED COMPLAINT
11 METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 32 12 Defendants.
13 14 Defendant MetLife Group, Inc. (“MetLife Group”) moves to dismiss all claims asserted 15 against it by plaintiff Marie A. Arnold. Dkt. No. 32. The Court held a hearing on the motion on 16 November 12, 2019. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral 17 arguments presented, the Court grants the motion to dismiss, and gives Ms. Arnold leave to file a 18 second amended complaint. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Ms. Arnold, proceeding pro se, originally filed this action against defendants MetLife Auto 21 & Home Insurance Agency, Inc. and MetLife Group, asserting claims for negligence and negligent 22 misrepresentation, as well as a claim under the Fourth Amendment…