Arnold
Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARIE A ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING METLIFE
v. GROUP, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AMENDED COMPLAINT
METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 32 12 Defendants.
13 Defendant MetLife Group, Inc. (“MetLife Group”) moves to dismiss all claims asserted against it by plaintiff Marie A. Arnold. Dkt. No. 32. The Court held a hearing on the motion on November 12, 2019. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court grants the motion to dismiss, and gives Ms. Arnold leave to file a second amended complaint. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Arnold, proceeding pro se, originally filed this action against defendants MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc. and MetLife Group, asserting claims for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, as well as a claim under the Fourth Amendment…