Remmert

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SHIRLEY V. REMMERT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-05803-HSG

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v.

10 JOSH STAUFFER, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiff brings this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San Mateo County 14 Deputy District Attorney Josh Stauffer and Deputy Public Guardian Vanessa Osuna. Dkt. No. 1. 15 For the reasons set forth below, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by a 2011 16 vexatious litigant order. 17 DISCUSSION 18 I. Plaintiff’s Litigation History 19 Plaintiff is no stranger to this Court. Most recently, the Court dismissed the complaint in 20 C No. 18-cv-2154 HSG, Remmert v. Karesh (“Remmert I”), on the grounds that the complaint’s 21 allegations were legally untenable, frivolous, irrational, wholly incredible and based on fantastic 22 and delusional scenarios, and violated the vexatious litigant order to which plaintiff was subject. 23 See Order of Dismissal, C No. 18-cv-2154 HSG, Remmert v.…