Arnold

Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20195:19-cv-03920California3,668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARIE A ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING BRIGHTHOUSE

v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED

METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE COMPLAINT AGENCY, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendants.

13 Defendant Brighthouse Life Insurance Company (“Brighthouse”) moves to dismiss all claims asserted against it by plaintiff Marie A. Arnold. Dkt. No. 24. The Court held a hearing on the motion on November 12, 2019. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court grants the motion to dismiss, and gives Ms. Arnold leave to file a second amended complaint. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Arnold, proceeding pro se, originally filed this action against defendants MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc. and MetLife Group, Inc., asserting claims for negligence and negligent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.