Dorfman

Peak Health Center v. Dorfman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20195:19-cv-04145California8,406 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 PEAK HEALTH CENTER, Case No. 19-cv-04145-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

10 v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND;

DENYING ANTI-SLAPP MOTION TO

11 BRANDON DORFMAN, STRIKE WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 11

13 14 Plaintiff Peak Health Center (“Peak Health”) filed this action against defendant Brandon 15 Dorfman and Does 1-101 on July 18, 2019. Dkt. No. 1. Peak Health subsequently filed an 16 amended complaint as of right on July 30, 2019, asserting the following claims: (1) trade libel; (2) 17 intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (3) negligent interference with 18 prospective economic advantage; (4) unfair competition under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 19 § 1125(a); and (5) unfair competition under California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et 20 seq. Dkt. No. 8. This Court has federal question jurisdiction over Peak Health’s Lanham Act 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.