In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20194:18-cv-01885California1,457 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG

LITIGATION

8 ORDER GRANTING MICROSOFT’S

MOTION TO STAY ’064 CLAIMS

9 This Document Relates To: Re: Dkt. No. 656 10

ALL ACTIONS

11

12 13 Pending before the Court is Microsoft’s motion to stay all claims and counterclaims 14 relating to U.S. Patent No. 7,184,064 (the “’064 Patent”), pending a decision from the Federal 15 Circuit on the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s (“PTAB’s”) invalidation of all claims of U.S. Patent 16 No. 6,690,387 (the “’387 Patent”). Dkt. No. 656 (“Mot.”) After carefully considering the parties’ 17 arguments, the Court GRANTS Microsoft’s motion. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V. and U.S. Philips Corp. (collectively, “Philips”) 20 instituted this patent infringement action in December 2015, alleging infringement of eleven 21 patents. In November 2016, Microsoft intervened in the actions against several of the Defendants, 22 and Philips counterclaimed against Microsoft for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.