LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. ITP Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE Case No. 19-CV-01538-LHK

P.C.,

13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL

14 v. JURISDICTION WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND

15 GLOTRADE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 51 16 Defendants. 17 LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. (“Plaintiff”) sued eighteen defendants, including WTMR, LLC (“Defendant”), for alleged violations of the Lanham Act, California’s False Advertising Law, and California’s Unfair Competition Law, as well as a claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 18. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave to 24 25 1 Defendant’s motion to dismiss contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. See Mot. at 1-2. …