Arnold

Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20195:19-cv-03920California3,014 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARIE A. ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING METLIFE AUTO

10 v. & HOME INSURANCE AGENCY,

INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

11 METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE AMENDED COMPLAINT AGENCY, INC., et al., 12 Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants.

13 14 Defendant MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc. (“MAHIA”) moves to dismiss 15 all claims asserted against it by plaintiff Marie A. Arnold. Dkt. No. 24. The Court held a hearing 16 on the motion on November 12, 2019. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, 17 as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court grants the motion to dismiss, and gives Ms. 18 Arnold leave to file a second amended complaint. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Ms. Arnold, proceeding pro se, originally filed this action against defendants MAHIA and 21 MetLife Group, Inc. (“MetLife Group”), asserting claims for negligence and negligent 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.