Harding

United States v. Harding

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20193:18-cv-01652California2,268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

21 On March 15, 2008, the government filed the instant action against defendants Alfred 22 Harding, Cheryl Harding, and the California Franchise Tax Board (“Board”). Dkt. No. 1 (Compl.). 23 The government seeks $5,402,042.51,1 plus interest, penalties, and statutory additions, in unpaid 24 joint federal income taxes. Id. at 9:14–17. In the compliant, the government sought to foreclose tax

26 1 In the complaint, the government originally sought $5,019,760.91 – Mr. Harding’s liability as of February 2018. Compl. at 6:20–22. The government later updated the amount to 27 $5,402,042.51, to reflect Mr. Harding’s alleged liability as of July 31, 2019. Mot. Default J. at 3:20– liens on two parcels of real property owned by Cheryl Harding. Id. at 10:12–17. However, the United States no longer seeks to foreclose on the tax liens, since it settled those claims with Ms. Harding, who owns the attached property. Mot. Default J. at 2:23–24. The government named the Board as a defendant out of an abundance of caution, to prevent the Board from claiming an interest in the attached property. Id. at 3:2–4. The government alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.