Naiman

Naiman v. True Renewable Energy, Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20194:18-cv-04540California317 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SIDNEY NAIMAN, Case No. 18-cv-04540-KAW

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 36 10 TRUE RENEWABLE ENERGY, INCORPORATED, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 On July 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal of the individual claims with 14 prejudice, and class claims without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 35.) That same day, the Court ordered 15 Plaintiff to file a dismissal within 60 days, absent any extension by the Court. (Dkt. No. 36.) The 16 Court further stated that to the extent Plaintiff sought to dismiss the class claims, Plaintiff must 17 address the Diaz factors. Diaz v. Tr. Territory of Pac. Islands, 876 F.2d 1404, 1408 (9th Cir. 18 1989) (listing factors the court must inquire into to determine whether there is prejudice to the 19 class members from dismissal of the class claims). 20 On September 16, 2019, Plaintiff filed a notice to extend the time to file dispositive 21 documentation by thirty days in order to finalize the settlement agreement. (Dkt. No. 37.) Thus,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.