Pantoja

Pantoja v. RAMCO Enterprises,L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20195:19-cv-03336California6,558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BEATRIZ CISNEROS PANTOJA, et al., Case No. 19-CV-03336-LHK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND AND DENYING REQUEST

v.

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

RAMCO ENTERPRISES,L.P., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant. 17 On June 12, 2019, Defendant RAMCO Enterprises (“Defendant”) removed this action from the Superior Court of California for the County of Monterey. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff Carmela Maribel Arroyo’s (“Plaintiff”)1 motion to remand and request for attorney’s fees. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand and DENIES Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees. I. BACKGROUND 25 26 1 According to Plaintiff, the previous class representative, Beatriz Cisneros Pantoja, settled her claims with Defendant individually. ECF No. 16 at 9 n.2. Plaintiff’s counsel then located Carmela Maribel Arroyo to serve as class representative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.