Pantoja
Pantoja v. RAMCO Enterprises,L.P.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12 BEATRIZ CISNEROS PANTOJA, et al., Case No. 19-CV-03336-LHK
13 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMAND AND DENYING REQUEST
14 v.
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
15 RAMCO ENTERPRISES,L.P., Re: Dkt. No. 16 16 Defendant. 17 18 On June 12, 2019, Defendant RAMCO Enterprises (“Defendant”) removed this action 19 from the Superior Court of California for the County of Monterey. ECF No. 1. Before the Court 20 is Plaintiff Carmela Maribel Arroyo’s (“Plaintiff”)1 motion to remand and request for attorney’s 21 fees. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this 22 case, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand and DENIES Plaintiff’s request for 23 attorneys’ fees. 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 26 1 According to Plaintiff, the previous class representative, Beatriz Cisneros Pantoja, settled her 27 claims with Defendant individually. ECF No. 16 at 9 n.2. Plaintiff’s counsel then located Carmela Maribel Arroyo to serve as class representative…