Pantoja

Pantoja v. RAMCO Enterprises,L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20195:19-cv-03336California6,558 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 BEATRIZ CISNEROS PANTOJA, et al., Case No. 19-CV-03336-LHK

13 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND AND DENYING REQUEST

14 v.

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

15 RAMCO ENTERPRISES,L.P., Re: Dkt. No. 16 16 Defendant. 17 18 On June 12, 2019, Defendant RAMCO Enterprises (“Defendant”) removed this action 19 from the Superior Court of California for the County of Monterey. ECF No. 1. Before the Court 20 is Plaintiff Carmela Maribel Arroyo’s (“Plaintiff”)1 motion to remand and request for attorney’s 21 fees. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this 22 case, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand and DENIES Plaintiff’s request for 23 attorneys’ fees. 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 26 1 According to Plaintiff, the previous class representative, Beatriz Cisneros Pantoja, settled her 27 claims with Defendant individually. ECF No. 16 at 9 n.2. Plaintiff’s counsel then located Carmela Maribel Arroyo to serve as class representative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.