Johnson v. San Carlos Inn

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20193:19-cv-00061California1,168 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-00061-SK

Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER

v. BRIEFING AND CONTINUNG

HEARING

SAN CARLOS INN, Defendant. Regarding Docket No.

12 Defendant San Carlos Inn, L.P. (“Defendant”) moves for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that (1) Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief is moot because all alleged barriers have either been remedied or do not exist, and (2) Plaintiff lacks standing. Plaintiff makes several procedural arguments in response to Defendant’s motion and fails to address these factual issues in any way. First, Plaintiff argues that this motion was filed in violation of the stay on all proceedings pursuant to General Order 56. General Order 56 states in relevant part: “All other discovery and proceedings are STAYED unless the assigned judge orders otherwise.” Several judges in this District have rejected similar arguments regarding the scope of General…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.