Johnson v. San Carlos Inn
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-00061-SK
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER
9 v. BRIEFING AND CONTINUNG
HEARING
10 SAN CARLOS INN, 11 Defendant. Regarding Docket No. 22
12 13 Defendant San Carlos Inn, L.P. (“Defendant”) moves for judgment on the pleadings on the 14 grounds that (1) Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief is moot because all alleged barriers have 15 either been remedied or do not exist, and (2) Plaintiff lacks standing. Plaintiff makes several 16 procedural arguments in response to Defendant’s motion and fails to address these factual issues 17 in any way. 18 First, Plaintiff argues that this motion was filed in violation of the stay on all proceedings 19 pursuant to General Order 56. General Order 56 states in relevant part: “All other discovery and 20 proceedings are STAYED unless the assigned judge orders otherwise.” Several judges in this 21 District have rejected similar arguments regarding the scope of General…