Petersen

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 MICHAEL PETERSEN, Case No. 18-cv-02448-LB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

13 v.

14 CITY OF OAKLEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 The plaintiff failed to appear for his ENE session on November 4, 2019. The court now issues 19 an order to the plaintiff to appear in person on December 5, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. to show cause why 20 the court should not dismiss his case for his failure to prosecute it. The parties must file a written 21 update by December 3, 2019 about the plaintiff’s counsel’s efforts to locate the plaintiff. 22 23 STATEMENT 24 In his complaint, Mr. Petersen alleges force that occurred on April 28, 2017.1 On May 10, 25 2018, the defendants informed the plaintiff that Oakley Police Department did not have any record 26 27 1 Id. at 3 (¶ 8). 1 of an interaction between its officers and Mr. Petersen on April 28, 2017.2 The court ordered the 2 plaintiff…