Johnson v. L. Wang Family Partners, LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20195:19-cv-00207California346 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-00207-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

10 v. PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR

CONSENT DECREE

11 L. WANG FAMILY PARTNERS, LP, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 51 Defendants. 12

13 On November 13, 2019, the parties filed a proposed consent decree resolving plaintiff 14 Scott Johnson’s claims with respect to injunctive relief. Dkt. No. 51. The Court has reviewed the 15 proposed consent decree and its attached documents. Paragraph 8 of the proposed consent decree 16 states that “Defendants agree to maintain all of the remedial work set forth [in the attached Exhibit 17 A] in its current condition.” Id. at 3 (emphasis added). Paragraph 12 then contemplates the Court 18 retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the consent decree “for twenty-four (24) months after 19 the date of this Consent Decree, or until the relief contemplated by this Order is completed, 20 whichever occurs later.” Id. at 4 (emphasis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.