Toler

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOEL THOMAS TOLER, Case No. 19-cv-05810-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

MOTION SHOULD NOT BE

? v. GRANTED 10 PAUL GOSPODARCZYK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 4 11 Defendants. 12

13 On October 25, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 4. To date, Plaintiff 14 || has not filed his opposition, which was due by November 8, 2019. 3 15 In general, an opposition must be filed and served “not more than 14 days after the motion 16 || was filed.” L.R. 7-3(a). The Court may interpret a failure to oppose a motion as a concession that 3 17 the motion should be granted. See GN Resound A/S v. Callpod, Inc., No. C 11-04673 SBA, 2013 18 || WL 1190651, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013) (construing plaintiff's failure to oppose defendant’s 19 || argument as a concession of said argument); see also Marziano v. Cty of Marin, No. C-10-2740 20 || EMC, 2010 WL 38955258, at *4 (N.D. Cal.…