Toler
Toler v. Gospodarczyk
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOEL THOMAS TOLER, Case No. 19-cv-05810-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
MOTION SHOULD NOT BE
? v. GRANTED PAUL GOSPODARCZYK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 4 Defendants.
On October 25, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 4. To date, Plaintiff || has not filed his opposition, which was due by November 8, 2019. In general, an opposition must be filed and served “not more than 14 days after the motion || was filed.” L.R. 7-3(a). The Court may interpret a failure to oppose a motion as a concession that the motion should be granted. See GN Resound A/S v. Callpod, Inc., No. C 11-04673 SBA, 2013 || WL 1190651, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013) (construing plaintiff's failure to oppose defendant’s || argument as a concession of said argument); see also Marziano v. Cty of Marin, No. C-10-2740 || EMC, 2010 WL 38955258, at *4 (N.D. Cal.…