Fox

Fox v. Uribe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20195:18-cv-07221-BLFCalifornia3,052 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

LEONARD JAMES FOX,

11 Case No. 18-07221 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

AND OF SERVICE; DIRECTING

v. 13 DEFENDANTS TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR

14 T. URIBE, et al., NOTICE REGARDING SUCH

MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO

15 Defendants. CLERK 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officers and medical personnel at Salinas Valley State Prison 20 (“SVSP”). The Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend to correct several 21 deficiencies. (Docket No. 8.) Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint. (Docket No. 15.) 22 23 DISCUSSION 24 A. Standard of Review 25 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a 26 prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a 27 governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

Fox · N.D. California · 2019 | Caselegis