In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG
LITIGATION
ORDER ON RENEWED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL This Document Relates To: Re: Dkt. No. 860
ALL ACTIONS
Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint renewed administrative motion to file under seal. The Court previously granted in part and denied in part the parties’ administrative motions to file under seal. Dkt. No. 789. Having carefully considered the pending motion and supporting declarations, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the parties’ motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). “This standard derives from the common law right ‘to inspect and copy public…