Jenkins

Jenkins v. Bloom

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20193:19-cv-05762California880 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ROBERT LEE JENKINS, JR., No. C 19-5762 WHA (PR) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 11 v. 12 TED BLOOM; S. CAMPAIGNE; K.

THOMPSON; D. CHAMBERLAIN;

13 K. HOFFMAN; 14 Defendants. / 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983 against officials at the California Training Facility. He is granted leave to proceed in 19 forma pauperis in a separate order. For the reasons discussed below, the complaint is dismissed 20 for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 21 ANALYSIS 22 A. STANDARD OF REVIEW 23 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 24 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 25 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims 26 which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.