Favor

Favor v. Stevenson-Bridges

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20195:19-cv-00419California801 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR,

11 Case No. 19-00419 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER OF TRANSFER v. 13 14 MARCIA STEVENSON-BRIDGES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at the California Correctional Institution (“CCI”) in 19 Tehachapi, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against 20 two individuals. (Docket No. 1.) The Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend 21 for Plaintiff to attempt to correct several deficiencies. (Docket No. 10.) Plaintiff has 22 filed an amended complaint. (Docket No. 14.) 23 24 DISCUSSION 25 A. Standard of Review 26 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a 27 prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a 1 cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim 2 upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.