Sponchiado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTIAN SPONCHIADO, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07533-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 27 (“Mot.”). For the reasons articulated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Christian Sponchiado and Courtney Davis bring this putative consumer class action against Defendant Apple, Inc., alleging that Apple misrepresented the pixel resolutions and display sizes for the iPhone X, iPhone XS, and iPhone XS Max products (the “iPhone Products”). See generally Dkt. No. 26 (“FAC”). The FAC alleges the following facts, which are taken as true for the purpose of deciding the motion to dismiss. 1 A. Screen Pixels A pixel is a…