Crawley

Crawley v. City of Oakland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20193:19-cv-05433California3,410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARCUS J CRAWLEY, Case No. 19-cv-05433-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS; AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

CITY OF OAKLAND, MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant. Docket Nos. 12,

12 13 Plaintiff Marcus Crawley has filed suit against the City of Oakland (“City”). Currently pending before the Court is the City’s motion to dismiss and Mr. Crawley’s related motion to strike. Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, the Court finds the motions suitable for disposition without oral argument and thus VACATES the hearing on the motion. The Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss and DENIES in part the motion to strike. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Although the complaint is not a model of clarity, Mr. Crawley has, in his opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, given further details explaining the basis of his lawsuit. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.