Williams v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20193:17-cv-06331California3,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 08-CR-00040-LHK-1 Plaintiff, Case No. 17-CV-06331-LHK

v. ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

DONALD RAY WILLIAMS, Re: Dkt. Nos. 448, 435 Defendant. 17 Before the Court is the Government’s motion to dismiss Defendant Williams’s October 31, 2017 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF No. 448. In its motion, the Government argued that Defendant’s motion is untimely and that equitable tolling is not appropriate. For the following reasons, the Court requires additional briefing before it can rule on the Government’s motion. Because the Court believes the aid of defense counsel is needed, the Court administratively stays the case and orders the Federal Public Defender to identify a Criminal Justice Act panel attorney who is available to take this case. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.