France

France v. Eyster

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20193:19-cv-06141California917 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6 7 MICHAEL RAY FRANCE, No. C 19-6141 WHA (PR) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v. 10

DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHARLES

11 EYSTER, 12 Defendant. / 13 14 INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff, an inmate in the Mendocino County Jail, filed this pro se civil rights case 16 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Mendocino County District Attorney Charles Eyster for 17 submitting false testimony and plaintiff’s probation hearing. Plaintiff requests monetary 18 compensation and to have Eyster criminally charged and barred from his law in the United 19 States. Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. For the 20 reasons discussed below, the complaint is dismissed. 21 ANALYSIS 22 A. STANDARD OF REVIEW 23 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 24 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 25 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.