Furnace

Furnace v. Emerson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20193:19-cv-07495California1,406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 EDWARD T. FURNACE, No. C 19-7495 WHA (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE v. C. EMERSON; B. WOODS, Defendants. / 14 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two officials at Pelican Bay State Prison. He is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. For the reasons discussed below, the complaint is ordered served upon defendants. ANALYSIS A. STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.