Vilsack

Center for Environmental Health v. Vilsack

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20193:18-cv-01763California4,251 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL Case No. 18-cv-01763-RS (TSH) HEALTH, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, DISCOVERY ORDER 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 91, 92, 93, 96 10 SONNY PERDUE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 On January 19, 2017, the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) published a final rule setting detailed standards for organically produced livestock. The Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices (“OLPP”) Rule was set to become effective on March 20, 2017, but the USDA delayed the effective date of the rule three times, before finally withdrawing it in March 2018. Plaintiffs challenge the withdrawal of that rule, arguing that the revocation is unlawful under the Organic Foods Production Act (“OFPA”) and arbitrary and capricious and unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). “Generally, judicial review of agency action is limited to review of the record on which the administrative decision was based.” Thompson v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, 885 F.2d 551, 555 (9th Cir. 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.