Wilkins

Wilkins v. County of Contra Costa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20193:16-cv-07016California4,323 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEENAN G. WILKINS, Case No. 16-cv-07016-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. 9

10 DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 14 1983. Previously, while multiple motions for summary judgment were fully briefed and pending, 15 plaintiff filed motions to amend and motions to compel, though he had not first sought the 16 discovery from defendants. The Court vacated all pending motions and permitted plaintiff an 17 opportunity to file a third amended complaint to contain all the claims he wished to pursue. 18 Plaintiff has filed a third amended complaint. 19 DISCUSSION 20 STANDARD OF REVIEW 21 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 22 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.