Home Depot U.S.A., Inc v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20195:16-cv-04865California2,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC, Case No. 16-cv-04865-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION

FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY; KRONOS WORLDWIDE, [Re: ECF 150] INC.; AND MILLENNIUM INORGANIC CHEMICALS, INC., n/k/a CRISTAL USA, INC., Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”) claims that Defendants E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. (“DuPont”), Cristal USA, Inc. (“Cristal”), Huntsman International, LLC (“Huntsman”), and Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (“Kronos”) participated in a conspiracy to fix the price of titanium dioxide. This is one of several antitrust actions filed throughout the country based on the alleged price-fixing conspiracy. All of the actions share substantially the same record. After the Third Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the defendants in a published opinion, Valspar Corp. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.