Schwendeman
Schwendeman v. Health Carousel, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 CONNIE SCHWENDEMAN, Case No. 18-cv-07641-BLF
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
10 v. MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION; AND STAYING
11 HEALTH CAROUSEL, LLC and HEALTH ACTION
CAROUSEL TRAVEL NETWORK, LLC,
12 [Re: ECF 19] Defendants. 13
14 15 Plaintiff Connie Schwendeman asserts a single claim under California’s Private Attorneys 16 General Act (“PAGA”) against her former employers, Defendants Health Carousel, LLC and 17 Health Carousel Travel Network, LLC (collectively, “Health Carousel”). Health Carousel has 18 filed a motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the action. 19 Having considered the parties’ briefs and supplemental briefs, the relevant legal 20 authorities, and the oral argument of counsel, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel 21 arbitration. However, the Court STAYS the action pending completion of arbitration rather than 22 dismissing it as requested by Health…