Schwendeman

Schwendeman v. Health Carousel, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20195:18-cv-07641California6,550 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 CONNIE SCHWENDEMAN, Case No. 18-cv-07641-BLF

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

10 v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION; AND STAYING

11 HEALTH CAROUSEL, LLC and HEALTH ACTION

CAROUSEL TRAVEL NETWORK, LLC,

12 [Re: ECF 19] Defendants. 13

14 15 Plaintiff Connie Schwendeman asserts a single claim under California’s Private Attorneys 16 General Act (“PAGA”) against her former employers, Defendants Health Carousel, LLC and 17 Health Carousel Travel Network, LLC (collectively, “Health Carousel”). Health Carousel has 18 filed a motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the action. 19 Having considered the parties’ briefs and supplemental briefs, the relevant legal 20 authorities, and the oral argument of counsel, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel 21 arbitration. However, the Court STAYS the action pending completion of arbitration rather than 22 dismissing it as requested by Health…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.