Drevaleva

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9

TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA,

10 Plaintiff, No. C 19-01454 WHA 11 v. 12

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE RESPONSE BY COURT

13

OFFICE OF RESOLUTION MANAGEMENT TO PLAINTIFF’S

OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS “REQUEST FOR

14 AFFAIRS, ROBERT WILKIE, United States CLARIFICATION” Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 The Court received a “Request for Clarification” from pro se plaintiff Tatyana 18 Evgenievna Drevaleva. Please be advised this is an improper communication. Plaintiff 19 complains that she cannot access Burroughs v. MSPB, 73 F. App’x 415, 417 (Fed. Cir. 2003). 20 She should know that this case is available on WestLaw, which is accessible to the public for 21 free at any public law library. Still, to accommodate plaintiff, it is appended as an exhibit hereto. 22 Next, she complains about the following statement in the order herein dated November 6, 23 2019: “In May 2018, without disclosing her 2017 VAMC termination, plaintiff applied to work 24 at the Minneapolis VAMC and…