Kaplowitz
Kaplowitz v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
15 Plaintiff filed an application for SSI in 2014, alleging disability beginning November 27, 16 2013. See Dkt. 28 (Administrative Record (“AR”)) 466-468. An Administrative Law Judge 17 (“ALJ”) held a hearing and issued an unfavorable decision on January 19, 2017. AR 13-33. The 18 ALJ found that Plaintiff had the following severe impairments: psoriatic arthritis, sacroiliitis, and 19 obesity. AR 18. The ALJ concluded that Plaintiff did not have an impairment or combination of 20 impairments that met or medically equaled one of the listed impairments. AR 20. The ALJ then 21 determined that Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) limited him to light work with 22 additional limitations. Id. The ALJ concluded that Plaintiff was not disabled because he was 23 capable of performing past relevant work as a graphic designer, as well as other jobs existing in 24 significant numbers in the national economy. AR 26. 25 After the Appeals Council denied review, Plaintiff sought review in this Court. Dkt. 1 26 (Complaint). In accordance with Civil Local Rule 16-5, the parties filed cross-motions for 27 summary judgment (Dkt. 31, 32), which are now ready…