Razavi
Razavi v. Coti
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 9 MELINA RAZAVI, Case No. 17-cv-04341-BLF
10 Plaintiff,
ORDER SCREENING THIRD
11 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND
DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS
12 CARLOS COTI, an individual; and GEICO BY U.S. MARSHAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a business 13 entity of unknown form,
14 Defendants. 15
16 17 Plaintiff Melina Razavi (“Razavi”), proceeding pro se, filed this action after being 18 involved in an automobile accident. She sues the other driver, Carlos Coti (“Coti”), and her own 19 insurer, Geico Insurance Company (“Geico”). Because Razavi is proceeding in forma pauperis, 20 her pleadings are subject to initial screening by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 21 The Court must dismiss an action brought in forma pauperis if it “(i) is frivolous or 22 malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief 23 against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. §…