Razavi

Razavi v. Coti

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20195:17-cv-04341California2,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 MELINA RAZAVI, Case No. 17-cv-04341-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING THIRD

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND

DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS

CARLOS COTI, an individual; and GEICO BY U.S. MARSHAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a business entity of unknown form,

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Melina Razavi (“Razavi”), proceeding pro se, filed this action after being involved in an automobile accident. She sues the other driver, Carlos Coti (“Coti”), and her own insurer, Geico Insurance Company (“Geico”). Because Razavi is proceeding in forma pauperis, her pleadings are subject to initial screening by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court must dismiss an action brought in forma pauperis if it “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.