Razavi
Razavi v. Coti
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 MELINA RAZAVI, Case No. 17-cv-04341-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER SCREENING THIRD
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND
DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS
CARLOS COTI, an individual; and GEICO BY U.S. MARSHAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a business entity of unknown form,
Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Melina Razavi (“Razavi”), proceeding pro se, filed this action after being involved in an automobile accident. She sues the other driver, Carlos Coti (“Coti”), and her own insurer, Geico Insurance Company (“Geico”). Because Razavi is proceeding in forma pauperis, her pleadings are subject to initial screening by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court must dismiss an action brought in forma pauperis if it “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. §…