SPRAWLDEF

SPRAWLDEF v. City of Richmond

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20194:18-cv-03918California1,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SPRAWLDEF, ET AL., CASE NO. 18-cv-03918-YGR

Petitioners, ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; VACATING

vs. BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL., PLEADINGS; AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO

FILE STATEMENTS AS TO EFFECT OF

Respondents. PENDENCY OF APPEAL Dkt. No.

The Stipulated Request for Extension of Time on the Briefing Schedule for the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 91) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the briefing and hearing schedule on the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 87) is VACATED. The Court seeks clarification on the parties’ positions as to the effect of the pending appeal on the Court’s jurisdiction to hear the motion, for the reasons set forth more fully herein. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY The petition in this matter was removed from state court on June 29,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.