SPRAWLDEF
SPRAWLDEF v. City of Richmond
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SPRAWLDEF, ET AL., CASE NO. 18-cv-03918-YGR
Petitioners, ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; VACATING
vs. BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL., PLEADINGS; AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO
FILE STATEMENTS AS TO EFFECT OF
Respondents. PENDENCY OF APPEAL Dkt. No.
The Stipulated Request for Extension of Time on the Briefing Schedule for the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 91) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the briefing and hearing schedule on the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 87) is VACATED. The Court seeks clarification on the parties’ positions as to the effect of the pending appeal on the Court’s jurisdiction to hear the motion, for the reasons set forth more fully herein. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY The petition in this matter was removed from state court on June 29,…