Mack

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALICIA M. MACK, Case No. 19-cv-00382-TSH

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

9 v.

10 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

11 Defendant. 12 13 I. BACKGROUND 14 Plaintiff Alicia Mack brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial 15 review of a final decision denying her claim for disability benefits. Pursuant to the January 22, 16 2019 Social Security Procedural Order issued in this case, Mack was required to file a motion for 17 summary judgment or for remand within 28 days of service of the Commissioner’s answer. ECF 18 No. 2. As the Commissioner served her answer on April 29, 2019 (ECF Nos. 12, 15), Mack’s 19 motion was originally due May 30, 2019.1 When Mack failed to file a motion of any kind, the 20 Court ordered her to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 21 ECF No. 16. Mack responded that she inadvertently missed the deadline and “hope[d] that we can 22 settle this matter promptly.” ECF No. 17. The…