Mack

Mack v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20193:19-cv-00382California1,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALICIA M. MACK, Case No. 19-cv-00382-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

11 Defendant. 12 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Alicia Mack brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision denying her claim for disability benefits. Pursuant to the January 22, 2019 Social Security Procedural Order issued in this case, Mack was required to file a motion for summary judgment or for remand within 28 days of service of the Commissioner’s answer. ECF No. 2. As the Commissioner served her answer on April 29, 2019 (ECF Nos. 12, 15), Mack’s motion was originally due May 30, 2019. When Mack failed to file a motion of any kind, the Court ordered her to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 16. Mack responded that she inadvertently missed the deadline and “hope[d] that we can settle this matter promptly.” ECF No. 17. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.