Kannan
Kannan v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RAJA KANNAN, Case No. 17-cv-07305-EJD (VKD)
9 Plaintiff,
OMNIBUS ORDER GRANTING
10 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
SEAL
11 APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 180, 185, 188, 194, 199, 205 Defendant. 12
13 14 In connection with the parties’ various discovery disputes (Dkt. Nos. 179, 184, 187, 193, 15 198, 204), the parties filed administrative motions to file certain documents under seal. Dkt. Nos. 16 180, 185, 188, 194, 199, 205. Having considered those motions, the Court grants in part and 17 denies in part the administrative motions, as set forth below. 18 There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and 19 documents accompanying dispositive motions that can be overcome only by a showing of 20 “compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of 21 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 22 …