Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE
10 v. MOTIONS TO SEAL
11 SONICWALL, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 163, 169, 173, 182, 184 Defendant. 12
13 14 In connection with defendant SonicWall, Inc.’s motion to strike plaintiff Finjan, Inc’s 15 second supplemental infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 164), the parties filed administrative 16 motions to file portions of their briefing and associated documents under seal. Dkt. Nos. 163, 169, 17 173. Having considered those motions, the Court grants the administrative motions, as set forth 18 below. 19 There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and 20 documents accompanying dispositive motions that can be overcome only by a showing of 21 “compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of 22 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal…