Binbit Argentina, S.A. v. Roe Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20194:19-cv-05384California1,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BINBIT ARGENTINA, S.A., Case No. 19-cv-05384-KAW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. RENEWED EX PARTE MOTION FOR

EARLY DISCOVERY

JOHN DOES 1-25, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants.

12 On August 27, 2019, Plaintiff Binbit Argentina, S.A. filed the instant case, asserting claims for breach of contract and violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. (Compl. at 1, Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff is an Argentinian company that provides mobile entertainment services. (Compl. ¶ 6.) To attract new customers, Plaintiff contracts with companies (“Networks”) that offer online marketing services through third parties called affiliates (“Affiliates”), who create advertising campaigns to encourage customers to use Plaintiff’s services. (Compl. ¶¶ 12, 13.) Plaintiffs allege that between February and April 2017, Defendants – an unknown Affiliate and/or Network – “created a misleading and fraudulent advertising campaign to sign up for 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.