Ingersoll

Ingersoll v. City of Del Rey Oaks

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20195:19-cv-01164California1,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ROBERT INGERSOLL, Case No. 19-cv-01164-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO v. DISMISS 13 CITY OF DEL REY OAKS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 14 Defendants. 15 16 Defendants City of Del Rey Oaks and Dino Pick move to dismiss plaintiff Robert Ingersoll’s second amended complaint alleging that Defendants violated his civil rights when they fired him from his position as a police officer. See Dkt. No. 39. Because Ingersoll’s second amended complaint makes no meaningful changes to his prior complaint, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss without leave to amend. I. New Allegations in the Second Amended Complaint Because the parties are familiar with majority of Ingersoll’s allegations and prior orders have previously recounted the facts of this case in greater detail (see Dkt. Nos. 21, 30), the Court focuses its discussion below to Ingersoll’s new factual allegations. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.