Ingersoll

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 ROBERT INGERSOLL, Case No. 19-cv-01164-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING 12 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO v. DISMISS 13 CITY OF DEL REY OAKS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Defendants City of Del Rey Oaks and Dino Pick move to dismiss plaintiff Robert 18 Ingersoll’s second amended complaint alleging that Defendants violated his civil rights 19 when they fired him from his position as a police officer. See Dkt. No. 39. Because 20 Ingersoll’s second amended complaint makes no meaningful changes to his prior 21 complaint, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss without leave to amend. 22 I. New Allegations in the Second Amended Complaint 23 Because the parties are familiar with majority of Ingersoll’s allegations and prior 24 orders have previously recounted the facts of this case in greater detail (see Dkt. Nos. 21, 25 30), the Court focuses its discussion below to Ingersoll’s new factual allegations. 26 …