Zithromia Limited v. Gazeus Negocios De Internet SA

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ZITHROMIA LIMITED et al., Case No. 17-cv-06475-JD

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 84 10 GAZEUS NEGOCIOS DE INTERNET SA et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 After the Court ordered discovery on the question of specific personal jurisdiction over 14 defendant Gazeus in this district, Dkt. No. 63, plaintiff Zithromia filed an amended complaint, 15 Dkt. No. 82. Zithromia has again failed to allege facts sufficient to plausibly demonstrate that the 16 Court has personal jurisdiction over Gazeus. Nothing in the amended complaint, or the record as a 17 whole before the Court, establishes any ties between the claims against Gazeus and defendant’s 18 conduct in this forum. Consequently, Gazeus’s motion to dismiss is granted. Dkt. No. 84. 19 The Court assumes the parties’ familiarity with the record and will not repeat the detailed 20 discussion of the facts and governing case law in the prior order. After questioning whether 21 personal jurisdiction over Gazeus could be shown in this district, the…