Doheny

Gilbert L. Loaec 2014 Trust v. Doheny

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20195:19-cv-02078California3,524 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 GILBERT L. LOAEC 2014 TRUST, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02078-NC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 13 DISMISS

ROMONA A. DOHENY,

14 Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant. 15 16 17 Before the Court is defendant Romona A. Doheny’s motion to dismiss. See Dkt. 18 No. 15. In their complaint, Plaintiffs Gilbert L. Loaec 2014 Trust, Yvonne Loaec-Russ, 19 and Gilbert L. Loaec accuse Doheny of taking advantage of Loaec’s advanced age. See 20 Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Because Doheny already answered (see Dkt. No. 8), the Court 21 converts her motion into a motion for judgment on the pleadings. For the following 22 reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Doheny’s motion. 23 I. Background 24 A. Factual Allegations in the Complaint1 25 At the time the complaint was filed, Loaec was 90 years old and lived in Sunnyvale, 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.