Parducci
Parducci v. AMCO Insurance Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICHARD P. PARDUCCI, Case No. 18-cv-07162-WHO
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO
9 v. DISMISS
10 OVERLAND SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 62, 64 Defendants. 11
12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Richard P. Parducci (“Parducci”) sues defendants AMCO Insurance Company 15 (“AMCO”) and Overland Solutions, Inc. (“Overland”) for allegedly engaging in a scheme to 16 overcharge customers of homeowners’ insurance by intentionally overestimating the replacement 17 costs of homes. I previously dismissed his original complaint because he did not sufficiently 18 plead fraud with requisite particularity. Order Granting Motions to Dismiss and Denying Motion 19 to Strike (“Order”) [Dkt. No. 56]. He fixed the deficiencies and now sufficiently pleads fraud in 20 his Amended Complaint, which forms the basis for his intentional misrepresentation, negligent 21 misrepresentation, elder abuse, and fraudulent business practices claims. Amended Complaint 22 …