Parducci
Parducci v. AMCO Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD P. PARDUCCI, Case No. 18-cv-07162-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO
v. DISMISS
OVERLAND SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 62, 64 Defendants.
12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Richard P. Parducci (“Parducci”) sues defendants AMCO Insurance Company (“AMCO”) and Overland Solutions, Inc. (“Overland”) for allegedly engaging in a scheme to overcharge customers of homeowners’ insurance by intentionally overestimating the replacement costs of homes. I previously dismissed his original complaint because he did not sufficiently plead fraud with requisite particularity. Order Granting Motions to Dismiss and Denying Motion to Strike (“Order”) [Dkt. No. 56]. He fixed the deficiencies and now sufficiently pleads fraud in his Amended Complaint, which forms the basis for his intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, elder abuse, and fraudulent business practices claims. Amended Complaint …